Model realistic API demand
Use requests per second when arrival rate matters, or virtual users when concurrent sessions better reflect the workload. Keep the traffic model consistent across runs so changes are measurable.
Validate API latency, throughput, failures, and release capacity with realistic traffic. Run HTTP API load tests from the browser, set pass/fail thresholds, compare results, and move stable checks into CI/CD without maintaining a worker fleet.
Does p95/p99 stay inside the target as throughput rises?
Which endpoint or dependency bends first?
Is the new build faster, slower, or simply noisier?
A useful API load test answers more than “can this endpoint receive traffic?” It tells you whether the API stays inside an agreed latency and error budget while demand rises, whether authentication and dependent calls remain stable, and whether a new release is slower than the baseline your team already trusts.
Use requests per second when arrival rate matters, or virtual users when concurrent sessions better reflect the workload. Keep the traffic model consistent across runs so changes are measurable.
Exercise authenticated endpoints, write operations, and multi-step request sequences instead of measuring only a synthetic health endpoint.
Set p95 latency and failure-rate limits before the run. Auto-stop gives teams a clear safety mechanism when a target is already outside the acceptable envelope.
Keep a repeatable scenario and compare current runs against a known baseline. This turns performance from a screenshot into a regression signal.
Move mature checks into CI/CD with API tokens and use alerts, exports, and shared results to keep the outcome visible outside the person who launched the run.
LoadTester handles distributed execution and worker coordination so the test definition and result stay the team’s focus.
Keep the API workload reproducible: pin the endpoint mix, payload shape, authentication method, concurrency model, and thresholds. Scale can change between runs; the API behavior you compare should not.
Start with the endpoint or workflow tied to a real user or business action. Define representative headers, authentication, request bodies, and expected responses.
Choose RPS for a controlled arrival rate or VUs for concurrency. Ramp deliberately and avoid jumping straight to destructive traffic.
Pick a p95 latency target and acceptable error rate before the run. A result is much easier to act on when success was defined in advance.
Watch latency, throughput, and failures while the test runs. Fix the bottleneck, rerun the same scenario, and keep the comparison meaningful.
Once the scenario is stable, trigger it from CI/CD or schedule it as a recurring baseline so regressions are found closer to the change that caused them.
Use the same platform for quick endpoint checks, pre-release capacity tests, and recurring performance validation. The free plan is suitable for lightweight API checks; higher-scale and automation features are available when the workflow grows.
Read the step-by-step API load testing tutorial for traffic modeling, scenarios, thresholds, metrics, and CI/CD rollout.
Open the supporting guide →API load testing measures how an HTTP API behaves as request volume or concurrency increases. The useful outputs are latency percentiles, throughput, error rate, and the point where the system leaves its acceptable performance envelope.
Use RPS when you want a controlled request arrival rate. Use virtual users when concurrent sessions and pacing better represent the workload. Many teams use both for different questions.
Yes. Build the test around the headers, tokens, payloads, and request sequence your API actually requires. Keep credentials scoped to the test environment and rotate them like any other automation secret.
Yes. After a scenario is stable and fast enough for the pipeline, trigger it through API tokens and use thresholds as a performance gate. Larger tests can remain scheduled or pre-release checks.
Start with a narrow API scenario on the free plan. Add traffic, regions, or automation only when the release question actually requires them.